↓ Skip to main content

Teaching in Hunter-Gatherers

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Teaching in Hunter-Gatherers
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13164-017-0347-2
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 31 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 15%
Social Sciences 14 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Arts and Humanities 8 8%
Philosophy 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,544,231
of 28,860,665 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#130
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,471
of 335,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,860,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.