↓ Skip to main content

Nutrition and Cost Comparisons of Select Canned, Frozen, and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 940)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
9 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nutrition and Cost Comparisons of Select Canned, Frozen, and Fresh Fruits and Vegetables
Published in
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, February 2014
DOI 10.1177/1559827614522942
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 180 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 25%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 63 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 70 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 426. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2026.
All research outputs
#85,785
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
#22
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#531
of 265,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.