↓ Skip to main content

Designer receptors show role for ventral pallidum input to ventral tegmental area in cocaine seeking

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
patent
2 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
575 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Designer receptors show role for ventral pallidum input to ventral tegmental area in cocaine seeking
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, March 2014
DOI 10.1038/nn.3664
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The ventral pallidum is centrally positioned within mesocorticolimbic reward circuits, and its dense projection to the ventral tegmental area (VTA) regulates neuronal activity there. However, the ventral pallidum is a heterogeneous structure, and how this complexity affects its role within wider reward circuits is unclear. We found that projections to VTA from the rostral ventral pallidum (RVP), but not the caudal ventral pallidum (CVP), were robustly Fos activated during cue-induced reinstatement of cocaine seeking--a rat model of relapse in addiction. Moreover, designer receptor-mediated transient inactivation of RVP neurons, their terminals in VTA or functional connectivity between RVP and VTA dopamine neurons blocked the ability of drug-associated cues (but not a cocaine prime) to reinstate cocaine seeking. In contrast, CVP neuronal inhibition blocked cocaine-primed, but not cue-induced, reinstatement. This double dissociation in ventral pallidum subregional roles in drug seeking is likely to be important for understanding the mesocorticolimbic circuits underlying reward seeking and addiction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 575 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 15 3%
France 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 545 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 149 26%
Researcher 111 19%
Student > Bachelor 68 12%
Student > Master 39 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Other 90 16%
Unknown 86 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 184 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 163 28%
Psychology 48 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 2%
Other 31 5%
Unknown 108 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,048,675
of 34,089,221 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#3,502
of 6,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,799
of 265,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#52
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,089,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.