↓ Skip to main content

Optimal management of shoulder impingement syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
649 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Optimal management of shoulder impingement syndrome
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, February 2014
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s36646
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Shoulder impingement is a progressive orthopedic condition that occurs as a result of altered biomechanics and/or structural abnormalities. An effective nonoperative treatment for impingement syndrome is aimed at addressing the underlying causative factor or factors that are identified after a complete and thorough evaluation. The clinician devises an effective rehabilitation program to regain full glenohumeral range of motion, reestablish dynamic rotator cuff stability, and implement a progression of resistive exercises to fully restore strength and local muscular endurance in the rotator cuff and scapular stabilizers. The clinician can introduce stresses and forces via sport-specific drills and functional activities to allow a return to activity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 649 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Papua New Guinea 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 641 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 126 19%
Student > Master 93 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 68 10%
Student > Postgraduate 43 7%
Other 37 6%
Other 91 14%
Unknown 191 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 133 20%
Sports and Recreations 95 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 2%
Engineering 10 2%
Other 27 4%
Unknown 213 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,804,853
of 32,518,848 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#64
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,319
of 362,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,518,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.