↓ Skip to main content

Individual IKs channels at the surface of mammalian cells contain two KCNE1 accessory subunits

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Individual IKs channels at the surface of mammalian cells contain two KCNE1 accessory subunits
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1323548111
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

KCNE1 (E1) β-subunits assemble with KCNQ1 (Q1) voltage-gated K(+) channel α-subunits to form IKslow (IKs) channels in the heart and ear. The number of E1 subunits in IKs channels has been an issue of ongoing debate. Here, we use single-molecule spectroscopy to demonstrate that surface IKs channels with human subunits contain two E1 and four Q1 subunits. This stoichiometry does not vary. Thus, IKs channels in cells with elevated levels of E1 carry no more than two E1 subunits. Cells with low levels of E1 produce IKs channels with two E1 subunits and Q1 channels with no E1 subunits--channels with one E1 do not appear to form or are restricted from surface expression. The plethora of models of cardiac function, transgenic animals, and drug screens based on variable E1 stoichiometry do not reflect physiology.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 54 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Chemistry 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 5 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2025.
All research outputs
#2,026,453
of 34,399,888 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#25,032
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,065
of 265,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#324
of 1,003 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,399,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,003 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.