↓ Skip to main content

Glucose Deprivation‐Induced Oxidative Stress in Human Tumor Cells: A Fundamental Defect in Metabolism?

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
7 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Glucose Deprivation‐Induced Oxidative Stress in Human Tumor Cells: A Fundamental Defect in Metabolism?
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, January 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06199.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recently, glucose deprivation-induced oxidative stress has been shown to cause cytotoxicity, activation of signal transduction (i.e., ERK1, ERK2, JNK, and Lyn kinase), and increased expression of genes associated with malignancy (i.e., bFGF and c-Myc) in MCF-7/ADR human breast cancer cells. These results have led to the proposal that intracellular oxidation/reduction reactions involving hydroperoxides and thiols may provide a mechanistic link between metabolism, signal transduction, and gene expression in these human tumor cells. The current study shows that several other transformed human cell types appear to be more susceptible to glucose deprivation-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative stress than untransformed human cell types. In a matched pair of normal and SV40-transformed human fibroblasts the cytotoxic process is shown to be dependent upon ambient O2 concentration. A theoretical model to explain the results is presented and implications to unifying modern theories of cancer are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 3 2%
United States 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 125 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Chemistry 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 34 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,726,634
of 31,943,232 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#1,007
of 13,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,814
of 218,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#145
of 2,671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,943,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.