↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for Candidal Bloodstream Infections in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients: The NEMIS Prospective Multicenter Study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
guideline
10 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk Factors for Candidal Bloodstream Infections in Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients: The NEMIS Prospective Multicenter Study
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, June 2001
DOI 10.1086/321811
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 238 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Master 25 10%
Other 22 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 7%
Other 55 22%
Unknown 63 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 65 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2025.
All research outputs
#1,415,384
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#2,540
of 21,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,046
of 60,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#7
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.