↓ Skip to main content

Kinetic and Stochastic Properties of a Persistent Sodium Current in Mature Guinea Pig Cerebellar Purkinje Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, September 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Kinetic and Stochastic Properties of a Persistent Sodium Current in Mature Guinea Pig Cerebellar Purkinje Cells
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, September 1998
DOI 10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1167
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Whole cell voltage-clamp techniques were employed to characterize the sodium (Na) conductances in acutely dissociated, mature guinea-pig cerebellar Purkinje cells. Three phenomenological components were noted: two inactivating and a persistent component (I(P)(Na). All exhibited similar sensitivities to tetrodotoxin (TTX; IC50 approximately 3 nM). The inactivating Na current demonstrates two components with different rates of inactivation. The persistent component activates at a more negative membrane potential than the inactivating components and shows little inactivation during a 5-s pulse. The amplitude of the persistent Na conductance had a higher Q10 than the inactivating Na conductance (2.7 vs. 1.3). (I(P)(Na) rapidly activates (approximately 1 ms) and deactivates (< 0.2 ms) and like the fast component appears to be exclusively Na permeable. (I(P)(Na) is not a "window" current because its range of activation exceeds the small overlap between the steady-state activation and inactivation characteristics of the inactivating current. Anomalous tail currents were observed during voltage pulses above -40 mV after a prepulse above -30 mV. The tails rose to a maximum inward current with a time constant of 1.5 ms and decayed to a persistent inward current with a time constant of 20 ms. The tails probably arose as a result of recovery from inactivation through the open state. The noise characteristics of (I(P)(Na) were anomalous in that the measured variance was lower at threshold voltages than would be predicted by a binomial model. The form of the variance could be partially accounted for by postulating that the maximum probability of activation of the persistent current was less than unity. The noise characteristics of (I(P)(Na) are such as to minimize noise near spike activation threshold and sharpen the threshold.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 49 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Professor 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2014.
All research outputs
#29,276,306
of 32,455,721 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#7,514
of 8,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,768
of 43,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#28
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,455,721 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.