↓ Skip to main content

RBrownie: an R package for testing hypotheses about rates of evolutionary change

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
RBrownie: an R package for testing hypotheses about rates of evolutionary change
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, May 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00112.x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 10 7%
Brazil 4 3%
Sweden 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 115 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 30%
Researcher 38 27%
Student > Master 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 7 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 75%
Environmental Science 14 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Linguistics 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 8 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2011.
All research outputs
#7,654,469
of 28,839,374 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,999
of 2,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,145
of 132,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,839,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.