↓ Skip to main content

Inherited myopathy of great Danes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Small Animal Practice, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inherited myopathy of great Danes
Published in
Journal of Small Animal Practice, April 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2006.00073.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A hereditary, non-inflammatory myopathy occurring in young great Danes with distinctive histological features in muscle biopsy specimens is reviewed. Onset of clinical signs is usually before one year of age and both sexes are affected. Clinical signs are characterised by exercise intolerance, muscle wasting, and an exercise-induced tremor. Although most affected dogs have a severe form of the disease, occasional dogs may have a less pronounced form and survive into adulthood with an acceptable quality of life. Litters containing affected puppies are born to clinically unaffected parents, and an autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance is likely. All recorded cases have had fawn or brindle coat coloration. Elevated serum creatinine kinase concentrations and spontaneous electrical activity in skeletal muscles are frequently found. While originally reported (Targett and others 1994) as a central core myopathy in this breed, the histochemical characteristics of the distinct cytoarchitectural structures differ from those of the well-characterised central core myopathy in human beings. In fact, these structures differ from any known myopathy in human beings and likely represents a unique non-inflammatory myopathy affecting dogs. Until this myopathy is characterised further, the name inherited myopathy in great Danes is suggested.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 88 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 28%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 42%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 23 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Neuroscience 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Small Animal Practice
#1,323
of 1,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,174
of 84,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Small Animal Practice
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.