↓ Skip to main content

Tea and Coffee Consumption and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Highwire), June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
3 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tea and Coffee Consumption and Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality
Published in
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Highwire), June 2010
DOI 10.1161/atvbaha.109.201939
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To examine the associations of coffee and tea consumption with risk of morbidity and mortality of stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) and with all-cause mortality.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Austria 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 9 6%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2021.
All research outputs
#539,480
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Highwire)
#79
of 7,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,376
of 149,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Highwire)
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.