↓ Skip to main content

「文法・訳読式教授法」の定義再考

Overview of attention for article published in HiSET Journal: Journal on Historical Studies of English Teaching in Japan, May 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「文法・訳読式教授法」の定義再考
Published in
HiSET Journal: Journal on Historical Studies of English Teaching in Japan, May 2005
DOI 10.11222/hisetjournal1986.20.0_7
Authors

平賀 優子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 60%
Linguistics 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2019.
All research outputs
#14,286,343
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from HiSET Journal: Journal on Historical Studies of English Teaching in Japan
#24
of 42 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,162
of 70,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HiSET Journal: Journal on Historical Studies of English Teaching in Japan
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.