↓ Skip to main content

SDM: A Fast Distance-Based Approach for (Super)Tree Building in Phylogenomics

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Biology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
SDM: A Fast Distance-Based Approach for (Super)Tree Building in Phylogenomics
Published in
Systematic Biology, October 2006
DOI 10.1080/10635150600969872
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 3 3%
Spain 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 94 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 13 12%
Professor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 28 26%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 61%
Computer Science 14 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 4 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,646,787
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#844
of 1,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,625
of 97,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.