↓ Skip to main content

漢字の字体に関する問題 : 書取の正誤判定の限界(漢字指導をめぐって,漢字の学習指導)

Overview of attention for article published in kokugokakyouiku, March 1968
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
漢字の字体に関する問題 : 書取の正誤判定の限界(漢字指導をめぐって,漢字の学習指導)
Published in
kokugokakyouiku, March 1968
DOI 10.20555/kokugoka.15.0_19
Authors

村内 英一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#6,398,946
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from kokugokakyouiku
#2
of 56 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#390
of 2,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from kokugokakyouiku
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 2,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them