↓ Skip to main content

The uncleared fundal pool in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: implications and outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The uncleared fundal pool in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: implications and outcomes
Published in
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, October 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70119-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The implications and outcomes of patients with an uncleared fundal pool of blood found at emergent upper endoscopy are not well described. We reviewed the records of 484 consecutive patients who presented over a 12-month period to our medical center with acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. All patients underwent upper endoscopy within 24 hours of their initial presentation. Patients with an uncleared fundal pool of blood at initial endoscopy were included in this study, and their findings and outcomes were compared with a randomly selected subgroup of these same patients who did not have residual gastric blood. Sixty-one patients (13%) had uncleared fundal pools despite gastric lavage and patient positioning. Findings on initial endoscopy included esophageal varices in 29 (47%), gastric ulcer in 12 (20%), portal hypertensive gastropathy in 5 (8%), Mallory-Weiss tear in 5 (8%), duodenal ulcer in 5 (8%), gastric varices in 4 (7%), Dieulafoy's lesion in 2 (3%), and other in 7 (11%). Twelve of these 61 patients had multiple findings and 4 (7%) had no lesion identified. Thirty-two of the 61 patients (52%) had at least one follow-up endoscopy, with new fundal lesions identified in 13 (41%): portal hypertensive gastropathy in 8, gastric ulcer in 2, gastric varices in 2, and leiomyoma in 1. Of these 13 new findings, 5 (38%) were judged significant either by the presence of active bleeding or stigmata of recent hemorrhage. Of the 4 patients with no identifiable lesion on initial endoscopy, 3 had a follow-up endoscopy and 2 were found to have a significant new finding in the fundus. The control group had a statistically significant lower percentage of endoscopic findings related to portal hypertension. Recurrent bleeding during the index hospitalization occurred in 54% of the patients with uncleared fundal pools versus 11% of the control group (0 < 0.01). Length of stay, number of units of blood transfused, need for emergent surgery for bleeding, as well as overall and bleeding-related mortality were all significantly greater in the patients with the uncleared fundal pool than in the control patients. The inability to clear a fundal pool of blood at emergent upper endoscopy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Further, new fundal lesions can be identified in 41% of patients on follow-up examination, with many being clinically significant. These data support the importance of clearing a fundal pool in patients undergoing endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Professor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,593,436
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#3,475
of 7,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,316
of 32,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.