↓ Skip to main content

DMAP: differential methylation analysis package for RRBS and WGBS data

Overview of attention for article published in Bioinformatics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
DMAP: differential methylation analysis package for RRBS and WGBS data
Published in
Bioinformatics, March 2014
DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu126
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The rapid development of high-throughput sequencing technologies has enabled epigeneticists to quantify DNA methylation on a massive scale. Progressive increase in sequencing capacity present challenges in terms of processing analysis and the interpretation of the large amount of data; investigating differential methylation between genome-scale data from multiple samples highlights this challenge.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 199 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 23%
Student > Master 22 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 22%
Computer Science 8 4%
Mathematics 5 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,997,130
of 33,079,649 outputs
Outputs from Bioinformatics
#2,868
of 14,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,373
of 257,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioinformatics
#45
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,079,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.