↓ Skip to main content

Does Moral and Social Conventional Reasoning Predict British Young People's Judgments About the Rights of Asylum‐Seeker Youth?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Social Issues, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does Moral and Social Conventional Reasoning Predict British Young People's Judgments About the Rights of Asylum‐Seeker Youth?
Published in
Journal of Social Issues, March 2014
DOI 10.1111/josi.12046
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 50%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2015.
All research outputs
#18,814,935
of 29,695,593 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Social Issues
#1,053
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,951
of 244,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Social Issues
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,695,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.