↓ Skip to main content

Leadership Models in Health Care—A Case for Servant Leadership

Overview of attention for article published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
757 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Leadership Models in Health Care—A Case for Servant Leadership
Published in
Mayo Clinic Proceedings, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.10.012
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Our current health care system is broken and unsustainable. Patients desire the highest quality care, and it needs to cost less. To regain public trust, the health care system must change and adapt to the current needs of patients. The diverse group of stakeholders in the health care system creates challenges for improving the value of care. Health care providers are in the best position to determine effective ways of improving the value of care. To create change, health care providers must learn how to effectively lead patients, those within health care organizations, and other stakeholders. This article presents servant leadership as the best model for health care organizations because it focuses on the strength of the team, developing trust and serving the needs of patients. As servant leaders, health care providers may be best equipped to make changes in the organization and in the provider-patient relationship to improve the value of care for patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 757 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 753 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 154 20%
Student > Bachelor 69 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 63 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 6%
Student > Postgraduate 35 5%
Other 94 12%
Unknown 294 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 119 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 106 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 80 11%
Social Sciences 46 6%
Psychology 16 2%
Other 85 11%
Unknown 305 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,336,968
of 32,480,160 outputs
Outputs from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#1,183
of 6,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,205
of 361,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mayo Clinic Proceedings
#20
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,480,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.