↓ Skip to main content

Accurate spectroscopic characterization of the HOC(O)O radical: A route toward its experimental identification

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chemical Physics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Accurate spectroscopic characterization of the HOC(O)O radical: A route toward its experimental identification
Published in
Journal of Chemical Physics, July 2017
DOI 10.1063/1.4990437
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A set of accurate spectroscopic parameters for the detection of the atmospherically important HOC(O)O radical has been obtained by means of state-of-the-art ab initio computations. These include advanced coupled cluster treatments, involving both standard and explicitly correlated approaches, to correctly account for basis set incompleteness and core-valence effects. Geometric parameters for the X̃(2)A(') and Ã(2)A('') states and, for the ground state only, vibrationally corrected rotational constants including quartic and sextic centrifugal distortion terms are reported. The infrared spectrum of the X̃(2)A(') state has been simulated in the 4000-400 cm(-1) wavenumber interval with an approach based on second order vibrational perturbation theory that allows accounting for anharmonic effects in both energies and intensities. Finally, the vibronic spectrum for the Ã ← X̃ transition has been calculated at three different temperatures in the 9000-3000 cm(-1) energy range with a time-independent technique based on the Franck-Condon approximation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 33%
Professor 1 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 4 67%
Physics and Astronomy 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2017.
All research outputs
#28,611,663
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chemical Physics
#17,466
of 24,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,801
of 358,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chemical Physics
#261
of 422 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,300 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 422 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.