| Title |
Future considerations for clinical dermatology in the setting of 21st century American policy reform: The Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act and Alternative Payment Models in dermatology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.01.031 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John S. Barbieri, Jeffrey J. Miller, Harrison P. Nguyen, Howard P. Forman, Jean L. Bolognia, Marta J. VanBeek, for Research of Policy Dynamics in Dermatology |
| Abstract |
With the introduction of the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act, clinicians who are not eligible for an exemption must choose to participate in 1 of 2 new reimbursement models: the Merit-based Incentive Payment System or Alternative Payment Models (APMs). Although most dermatologists are expected to default into the Merit-based Incentive Payment System, some may have an interest in exploring APMs, which have associated financial incentives. However, for dermatologists interested in the APM pathway, there are currently no options other than joining a qualifying Accountable Care Organization, which make up only a small subset of Accountable Care Organizations overall. As a result, additional APMs relevant to dermatologists are needed to allow those interested in the APMs to explore this pathway. Fortunately, the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act establishes a process for new APMs to be approved and the creation of bundled payments for skin diseases may represent an opportunity to increase the number of APMs available to dermatologists. In this article, we will provide a detailed review of APMs under the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act and discuss the development and introduction of APMs as they pertain to dermatology. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |