↓ Skip to main content

Nitrogen and Fluorine‐Codoped Carbon Nanowire Aerogels as Metal‐Free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

Overview of attention for article published in Chemistry - A European Journal, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nitrogen and Fluorine‐Codoped Carbon Nanowire Aerogels as Metal‐Free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Published in
Chemistry - A European Journal, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/chem.201701969
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The development of active, durable and low-cost catalysts to replace noble metal-based materials is highly desirable to promote the sluggish oxygen reduction reaction in fuel cells. Herein, nitrogen and fluorine-codoped three-dimensional carbon nanowire aerogels, composed of interconnected carbon nanowires were for the first time synthesized by hydrothermal carbonization process. Owing to their porous nanostructures and heteroatom-doping, the as-prepared carbon nanowire aerogels with optimized composition present excellent electrocatalytic activity that is comparable to commercial Pt/C. Remarkably, the aerogels also exhibit superior stability and methanol tolerance. This synthesis procedure paves a new way to design novel heteroatom-doped catalysts.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Professor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 9 41%
Materials Science 7 32%
Chemical Engineering 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2017.
All research outputs
#31,191,732
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry - A European Journal
#25,149
of 29,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#320,960
of 357,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry - A European Journal
#492
of 650 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,576 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 650 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.