↓ Skip to main content

Designer receptor manipulations reveal a role of the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system in isoflurane general anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
331 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Designer receptor manipulations reveal a role of the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system in isoflurane general anesthesia
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1310025111
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Mechanisms driving emergence from general anesthesia are not well understood. The noradrenergic brain nucleus locus coeruleus (LC) modulates arousal and may have effects on general anesthetic state. Using virally delivered designer receptors to specifically control LC norepinephrine (NE) neurons, we investigated the causal relationship between LC-NE activity and general anesthetic state under isoflurane. Selective activation of LC-NE neurons produced cortical electroencephalography (EEG) activation under continuous deep isoflurane anesthesia. Specifically, LC-NE activation reduced burst suppression in EEG and drove a rightward shift in peak EEG frequency with reduced δ EEG power and increased θ EEG power, measures of cortical arousal. LC-NE activation also accelerated behavioral emergence from deep isoflurane anesthesia; this was prevented with β or α1 noradrenergic antagonists. Moreover, these adrenoreceptor antagonists alone were sufficient to markedly potentiate anesthetic duration when delivered centrally or peripherally. Induction of anesthesia also was retarded by LC-NE activation. Our results demonstrate that the LC-NE system strongly modulates the anesthetic state, and that changes in LC-NE neurotransmission alone can affect the emergence from isoflurane general anesthesia. Taken together, these findings extend our understanding of mechanisms underlying general anesthesia and cortical arousal, and have significant implications for optimizing the clinical safety and management of general anesthesia.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 331 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Japan 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 319 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 25%
Researcher 61 18%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Master 33 10%
Professor 21 6%
Other 51 15%
Unknown 48 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 104 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 11%
Psychology 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 21 6%
Unknown 62 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,222,517
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#61,744
of 119,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,933
of 269,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#590
of 1,005 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,856 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,005 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.