↓ Skip to main content

Biochar application to hardrock mine tailings: Soil quality, microbial activity, and toxic element sorption

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geochemistry, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biochar application to hardrock mine tailings: Soil quality, microbial activity, and toxic element sorption
Published in
Applied Geochemistry, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.02.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlene N. Kelly, Christopher D. Peltz, Mark Stanton, David W. Rutherford, Colleen E. Rostad

Abstract

This study sets out to understand what might constitute a good death in the current UK context. It uses the demographic changes which have taken place in UK society over the period of the twentieth century to offer explanations for our relative unfamiliarity with dying and death. The study draws on two plays written by Nell Dunn as the data source; these are Home Death (2011) and Cancer Tales (2002), which are based on end-of-life experiences. A phenomenological approach is used to analyse this literature, drawing on the works of selected phenomenologists whose work is appropriate in the end-of-life context. Phenomenology seeks to understand the meaning of experience. This approach is used to gain an understanding of the meaning of the lived experiences of terminally ill patients, and their loved ones in order to gain a better appreciation of some of the needs and concerns which are important in end-of-life situations. Finally, the implications of the findings for end-of-life care are discussed in the light of recommendations of the recent report More Care Less Pathway (2013) which criticizes the implementation of the Liverpool Care Pathway for the Dying Patient in some hospital settings.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 138 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 26%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 36 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 24%
Engineering 11 8%
Chemistry 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 43 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geochemistry
#252
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,777
of 239,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geochemistry
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.