↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prevention and Treatment of Smoking and Tobacco Use During Pregnancy in Selected Indigenous Communities in High-Income Countries of the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand An Evidence-Based Review
Published in
CHEST, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2017.06.033
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tobacco smoking during pregnancy is the most important modifiable risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes and long-term health complications for mother and bab(ies). Tobacco use during pregnancy has reduced in high-income countries; but not for Indigenous women in Australia, New Zealand, the United States, and Canada. This evidence-based review focusses on tobacco use among Indigenous pregnant women in high-income countries, who share a history of European colonisation. Indigenous women are more likely to use tobacco because of socio-economic disadvantage, social norms, and poor access to culturally-appropriate tobacco cessation support. Complications arising from tobacco-smoking during pregnancy such as low birth weight, prematurity, perinatal death, and sudden infant death syndrome are much higher in Indigenous populations. Effective approaches to cessation in pregnant non-Indigenous women involves behavioral counselling with or without nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). Higher nicotine metabolism during pregnancy, and poor adherence, may affect therapeutic levels of NRT. Only two randomized trials were conducted among Indigenous women: neither found a statistically significant difference in cessation rates between the treatment and comparison arms. Considerations should be given to: a) whole life course approaches to reduce tobacco use in Indigenous women; b) prohibiting tobacco promotion, and reducing access to alcohol for minors to prevent smoking initiation in Indigenous youth, c) training healthcare professionals in culturally-appropriate smoking cessation care to improve services access. It is critical to ensure acceptability and feasibility of study designs, consult with the relevant Indigenous communities and pre-empt implementation challenges. Research is needed into the effect of reducing or stopping smoking during pregnancy when using NRT, on subsequent maternal and infant outcomes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 260 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 15%
Student > Master 24 9%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 6%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 109 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 14%
Psychology 18 7%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 121 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,999,687
of 34,020,007 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#4,127
of 17,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,232
of 357,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#50
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,020,007 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.