↓ Skip to main content

Large-scale GWAS identifies multiple loci for hand grip strength providing biological insights into muscular fitness

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
76 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Large-scale GWAS identifies multiple loci for hand grip strength providing biological insights into muscular fitness
Published in
Nature Communications, July 2017
DOI 10.1038/ncomms16015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hand grip strength is a widely used proxy of muscular fitness, a marker of frailty, and predictor of a range of morbidities and all-cause mortality. To investigate the genetic determinants of variation in grip strength, we perform a large-scale genetic discovery analysis in a combined sample of 195,180 individuals and identify 16 loci associated with grip strength (P<5 × 10-8) in combined analyses. A number of these loci contain genes implicated in structure and function of skeletal muscle fibres (ACTG1), neuronal maintenance and signal transduction (PEX14, TGFA, SYT1), or monogenic syndromes with involvement of psychomotor impairment (PEX14, LRPPRC and KANSL1). Mendelian randomization analyses are consistent with a causal effect of higher genetically predicted grip strength on lower fracture risk. In conclusion, our findings provide new biological insight into the mechanistic underpinnings of grip strength and the causal role of muscular strength in age-related morbidities and mortality.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 342 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 15%
Student > Master 33 10%
Student > Bachelor 28 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 64 19%
Unknown 92 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 9%
Sports and Recreations 25 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 5%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 116 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 171. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2025.
All research outputs
#297,500
of 34,318,950 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#4,250
of 82,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,819
of 358,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#66
of 933 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,318,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 933 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.