↓ Skip to main content

Probing for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in live dorsal root ganglion neurons with atomic force microscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Probing for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in live dorsal root ganglion neurons with atomic force microscopy
Published in
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.nano.2014.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) remains a major reason for cancer patients to withdraw from their lifesaving therapy. CIPN results in irreversible sensory and motor impairments; however, the epidemiology is largely unknown. Here, we report for the first time that chemotherapy drug vincristine not only reduced axonal regeneration in primary dorsal root ganglion neuron but also induced substantial changes in cell mechanical properties detected by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Confocal imaging analysis revealed vincristine-induced microtubule depolymerization. By using AFM for high-resolution live cell imaging and quantitative analysis, we observed significant changes in cell surface roughness and stiffness of vincristine-treated neurons. Elastic modulus was decreased (21-45%) with increasing dosage of vincristine. Further study with paclitaxel, another well-known CIPN drug, confirmed the link between cell mechanics and cytoskeleton organization. These data support that our system can be used for probing potential CIPN drugs that are of enormous benefit to new chemotherapy drug development.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Master 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 20%
Engineering 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2014.
All research outputs
#16,090,279
of 27,374,586 outputs
Outputs from Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
#781
of 1,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,843
of 239,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,374,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.