↓ Skip to main content

Hydralazine Associated Pauci-Immune Glomerulonephritis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hydralazine Associated Pauci-Immune Glomerulonephritis
Published in
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, March 2014
DOI 10.1097/rhu.0000000000000049
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hydralazine is a medication that has been used to manage hypertension and heart failure. In this case series, we report 4 patients who presented to a large, Midwestern academic medical center on chronic hydralazine therapy with acute kidney injury, nephritic urine sediment on urine microscopy, and the simultaneous presence of autoantibodies suggesting both drug-induced lupus and drug-induced vasculitis. All of them had evidence of pauci-immune glomerulonephritis on kidney biopsy. All the patients reported in our series are white women older than 60 years who were receiving hydralazine for more than 12 months at a dose of 150 mg or more. On initial presentation, all had evidence of acute kidney injury with nephritic sediment. These patients also had high titers of serum anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies of the antimyeloperoxidase subtype and simultaneous presence of multiple autoantibodies. All of them subsequently underwent a kidney biopsy, which revealed pauci-immune glomerulonephritis. This case series draws rheumatologists' attention to the possibility of pauci-immune glomerulonephritis in patients taking hydralazine, highlights the presence of multiple antibodies in these cases, and questions the long-term use of hydralazine especially in an elderly female population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Student > Master 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Psychology 2 14%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#24,786,738
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
#1,471
of 2,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,264
of 266,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,416 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.