↓ Skip to main content

Microbiota-Dependent Crosstalk Between Macrophages and ILC3 Promotes Intestinal Homeostasis

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
797 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Microbiota-Dependent Crosstalk Between Macrophages and ILC3 Promotes Intestinal Homeostasis
Published in
Science, March 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1249288
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The intestinal microbiota and tissue-resident myeloid cells promote immune responses that maintain intestinal homeostasis in the host. However, the cellular cues that translate microbial signals into intestinal homeostasis remain unclear. Here, we show that deficient granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) production altered mononuclear phagocyte effector functions and led to reduced regulatory T cell (T(reg)) numbers and impaired oral tolerance. We observed that RORγt(+) innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) are the primary source of GM-CSF in the gut and that ILC-driven GM-CSF production was dependent on the ability of macrophages to sense microbial signals and produce interleukin-1β. Our findings reveal that commensal microbes promote a crosstalk between innate myeloid and lymphoid cells that leads to immune homeostasis in the intestine.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 797 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 8 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 773 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 173 22%
Researcher 149 19%
Student > Master 85 11%
Student > Bachelor 57 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 40 5%
Other 130 16%
Unknown 163 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 216 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 197 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 10%
Neuroscience 11 1%
Other 36 5%
Unknown 181 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2026.
All research outputs
#2,977,896
of 33,982,974 outputs
Outputs from Science
#34,641
of 93,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,340
of 264,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#280
of 838 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,982,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 838 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.