↓ Skip to main content

Biochemical effects of salinity on oxygen isotope fractionation during cellulose synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in New Phytologist, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biochemical effects of salinity on oxygen isotope fractionation during cellulose synthesis
Published in
New Phytologist, January 2014
DOI 10.1111/nph.12696
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current isotope tree ring model assumes that 42% of the sucrose oxygen exchanges with stem water during cellulose synthesis and that the oxygen isotope biochemical fractionation is c. 27‰. However, previous studies have indicated that this model can overestimate the cellulose oxygen isotope ratio of plants under salinity or water stress. Saline stress increases soluble carbohydrates and osmolytes, which can alter exchange and biochemical fractionation during cellulose synthesis. To test the effect of salinity as well as the synthesis of osmolytes on exchange and biochemical fractionation, we grew wild-type and a transgenic mannitol synthesizer Arabidopsis thaliana hydroponically with fresh and saline water. We then measured the oxygen isotope ratios of leaf water, stem water and stem cellulose to determine the effects on exchange and biochemical fractionation. Biochemical fractionation did not change, but oxygen isotope exchange was twice as high for plants grown in saline water relative to freshwater-treated plants (0.64 and 0.3, respectively). Mannitol (osmolyte) synthesis did not affect exchange or biochemical fractionation regardless of salinity. Increases in salinity increased oxygen isotope exchange during cellulose synthesis, which may explain the overestimation of cellulose δ(18) O values under saline conditions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Japan 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 58 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Master 8 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 27%
Unspecified 14 22%
Environmental Science 9 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 11%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,223,099
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#8,343
of 8,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,169
of 307,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#97
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.