At least 10 different substances modulate the amplitude of nerve-evoked contractions of the gastric mill 4 (gm4) muscle of the crab, Cancer borealis. Serotonin, dopamine, octopamine, proctolin, red pigment concentrating hormone, crustacean cardioactive peptide, TNRNFLRFamide, and SDRNFLRFamide increased and -allatostatin-3 and histamine decreased the amplitude of nerve-evoked contractions. Modulator efficacy was frequency dependent; TNRNFLRFamide, proctolin, and allatostatin-3 were more effective when the motor neuron was stimulated at 10 Hz than at 40 Hz, whereas the reverse was true for dopamine and serotonin. The modulators that were most effective at high stimulus frequencies produced a significant decrease in muscle relaxation time; those that were most effective at low stimulus frequencies produced modest increases in relaxation time. Thus modulator actions that appear redundant when examined only at one stimulus frequency are differentiated when a range of stimulus dynamics is studied. The effects of TNRNFLRFamide, serotonin, proctolin, dopamine, and -allatostatin-3 on the amplitude and facilitation of nerve-evoked excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) in the gm4 and gastric mill 6 (gm6) muscles were compared. The EJPs in gm4 have a large initial amplitude and show relatively little facilitation, whereas the EJPs in gm6 have a small initial amplitude and show considerable facilitation. Modulators that enhanced contractions also enhanced EJP amplitude; -allatostatin-3 reduced EJP amplitude. The effects of these modulators on EJP amplitude were modest and showed no significant frequency dependence. This suggests that the frequency dependence of modulator action on contraction results from effects on excitation-contraction coupling. The modulators affected facilitation at these junctions in a manner consistent with a change in release probability. They produced a change in facilitation that is inversely related to their action on EJP amplitude.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2014.
All research outputs
#29,276,306
of 32,455,721 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#7,514
of 8,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,240
of 57,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#33
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,455,721 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
