↓ Skip to main content

Does Speed Matter? Revision Rates and Functional Outcomes in TKA in Relation to Duration of Surgery

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Does Speed Matter? Revision Rates and Functional Outcomes in TKA in Relation to Duration of Surgery
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Longer operative times may be required in complex total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however little is known about outcomes in procedures performed rapidly. We analysed 58,009 primary TKAs from the New Zealand National Joint Registry. The mean surgical duration was 89 minutes, and 50% of procedures lasted between 60 and 89 minutes. There was no difference in adjusted revision rates for groups lasting between 40 and 120 minutes, however procedures lasting >120 minutes had significantly higher revision rates. There was a higher revision rate in TKAs lasting <40 minutes (0.71 vs 0.48 revisions per 100 component years) but this was not statistically significant (P = 0.1). For primary TKAs lasting less than 120 minutes, further shortening operative time did not improve outcome, and very rapid procedures (<40 minutes) may lead to an increased risk of revision.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 16%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Librarian 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 49%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#1,947
of 4,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,692
of 235,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#18
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,623 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.