↓ Skip to main content

Double Dissociation of Format-Dependent and Number-Specific Neurons in Human Parietal Cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Cerebral Cortex, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Double Dissociation of Format-Dependent and Number-Specific Neurons in Human Parietal Cortex
Published in
Cerebral Cortex, January 2010
DOI 10.1093/cercor/bhp273
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Based on neuroimaging methods, it is a commonly held view that numerical representation in the human parietal lobes is format independent. We used a transcranial magnetic stimulation adaptation paradigm to examine the existence of functionally segregated overlapping populations of neurons for different numerical formats and to reveal how numerical information is encoded and represented. Based on 2 experiments, we found that right parietal lobe stimulation showed a dissociation between digits and verbal numbers, whereas the left parietal lobe showed a double dissociation between the different numerical formats. Further analysis and modeling also excluded pre- or postrepresentational components as the source of the current effects. These results demonstrate that both parietal lobes are equipped with format-dependent neurons that encode quantity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Italy 4 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 121 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 27%
Researcher 36 26%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 12 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 75 54%
Neuroscience 16 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 4%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 24 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2010.
All research outputs
#20,142,242
of 22,647,730 outputs
Outputs from Cerebral Cortex
#4,375
of 4,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,781
of 163,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cerebral Cortex
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,647,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.