↓ Skip to main content

Increased Theta and Alpha EEG Activity During Nondirective Meditation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
16 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
506 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Increased Theta and Alpha EEG Activity During Nondirective Meditation
Published in
Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine, November 2009
DOI 10.1089/acm.2009.0113
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In recent years, there has been significant uptake of meditation and related relaxation techniques, as a means of alleviating stress and maintaining good health. Despite its popularity, little is known about the neural mechanisms by which meditation works, and there is a need for more rigorous investigations of the underlying neurobiology. Several electroencephalogram (EEG) studies have reported changes in spectral band frequencies during meditation inspired by techniques that focus on concentration, and in comparison much less has been reported on mindfulness and nondirective techniques that are proving to be just as popular.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
India 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 493 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 15%
Student > Master 69 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 13%
Researcher 61 12%
Other 27 5%
Other 95 19%
Unknown 111 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 114 23%
Neuroscience 69 14%
Engineering 45 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 8%
Computer Science 23 5%
Other 84 17%
Unknown 130 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 144. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2026.
All research outputs
#364,185
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#90
of 2,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#802
of 153,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.