↓ Skip to main content

Unusual change in activity pattern at cool temperature in a reptile (Sphenodon punctatus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thermal Biology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unusual change in activity pattern at cool temperature in a reptile (Sphenodon punctatus)
Published in
Journal of Thermal Biology, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2014.02.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurélie Vermunt, Kelly M. Hare, Anne A. Besson

Abstract

Animals that can be active both during day and night offer unique opportunities to identify factors that influence activity pattern. By experimental manipulations of temperatures under constant photoperiod, we aimed to determine if emergence, activity and thermoregulatory behaviour of juvenile tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) varied at different temperatures (20°C, 12°C and 5°C). To help clarify its activity pattern, we compared tuatara with two lizard species endemic of the South Island of New Zealand for which activity pattern is known and clearly defined: the nocturnal common gecko Woodworthia "Otago/Southland" and the diurnal McCann׳s skink Oligosoma maccanni. Tuatara showed similar responses to both species of lizards. Similar to the diurnal skinks, tuatara emerged quickly at 20°C and 12°C while nocturnal geckos took more time to emerge. Like nocturnal geckos, tuatara continued to be active at 5°C, but only during the day. Interestingly, tuatara shifted from diurno-nocturnal activity at 20°C and 12°C to being strictly diurnal at 5°C. We suggest that this temperature-dependent strategy maximises their survival during cold periods.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 24 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Researcher 4 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 68%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,694,404
of 27,782,313 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thermal Biology
#987
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,964
of 240,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thermal Biology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,782,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.