↓ Skip to main content

Dexmedetomidine and ketamine sedation for muscle biopsies in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Paediatric Anaesthesia, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dexmedetomidine and ketamine sedation for muscle biopsies in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Published in
Paediatric Anaesthesia, March 2014
DOI 10.1111/pan.12387
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) possesses many potential challenges for anesthetic care. Invasive and noninvasive procedures with corresponding sedation or general anesthesia are frequent and necessary for affected patients. There remains a need for a better agent or agents for procedural sedation in patients with comorbid diseases. This study prospectively evaluated a combination of ketamine with two different doses of dexmedetomidine for sedation during muscle biopsy in patients with DMD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 13 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#23,971,455
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Paediatric Anaesthesia
#1,797
of 2,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,196
of 267,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paediatric Anaesthesia
#28
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,876 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.