You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying Species Conservation Strategies to Reduce Disease‐Associated Declines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12393 |
| Authors |
Brian D. Gerber, Sarah J. Converse, Erin Muths, Harry J. Crockett, Brittany A. Mosher, Larissa L. Bailey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Jersey | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 59% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 42 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2020.
All research outputs
#896,764
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#303
of 1,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,379
of 326,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#9
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,065 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 52.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.