↓ Skip to main content

Fast-Food Restaurants, Park Access, and Insulin Resistance Among Hispanic Youth

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Preventive Medicine, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fast-Food Restaurants, Park Access, and Insulin Resistance Among Hispanic Youth
Published in
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, April 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.12.007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Evidence of associations between the built environment and obesity risk has been steadily building, yet few studies have focused on the relationship between the built environment and aspects of metabolism related to obesity's most tightly linked comorbidity, type 2 diabetes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 27 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Psychology 8 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 4%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 49 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#8,569,085
of 32,775,379 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Preventive Medicine
#3,319
of 5,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,105
of 260,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Preventive Medicine
#39
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,775,379 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.