↓ Skip to main content

No Longer “GRAS”: The Trans Fatty Acids Debate

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Therapeutics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
No Longer “GRAS”: The Trans Fatty Acids Debate
Published in
Clinical Therapeutics, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.02.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

John G Ryan

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Argentina 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Chemistry 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2014.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Therapeutics
#2,158
of 3,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,401
of 236,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Therapeutics
#24
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.