↓ Skip to main content

High CO2 enhances the competitive strength of seaweeds over corals

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
461 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High CO2 enhances the competitive strength of seaweeds over corals
Published in
Ecology Letters, December 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01565.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Space competition between corals and seaweeds is an important ecological process underlying coral-reef dynamics. Processes promoting seaweed growth and survival, such as herbivore overfishing and eutrophication, can lead to local reef degradation. Here, we present the case that increasing concentrations of atmospheric CO(2) may be an additional process driving a shift from corals to seaweeds on reefs. Coral (Acropora intermedia) mortality in contact with a common coral-reef seaweed (Lobophora papenfussii) increased two- to threefold between background CO(2) (400 ppm) and highest level projected for late 21st century (1140 ppm). The strong interaction between CO(2) and seaweeds on coral mortality was most likely attributable to a chemical competitive mechanism, as control corals with algal mimics showed no mortality. Our results suggest that coral (Acropora) reefs may become increasingly susceptible to seaweed proliferation under ocean acidification, and processes regulating algal abundance (e.g. herbivory) will play an increasingly important role in maintaining coral abundance.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Mexico 5 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 425 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 19%
Student > Master 64 14%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Other 25 5%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 60 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 216 47%
Environmental Science 100 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 40 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 <1%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 72 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,689,940
of 31,970,964 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#760
of 3,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,893
of 236,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#3
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,970,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.