↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in the Management of Infections due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Overview of attention for article published in Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Challenges in the Management of Infections due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
Published in
Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online), May 2016
DOI 10.1086/675604
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are increasing and are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Members of the Emerging Infections Network treating CRE encountered difficulties in obtaining laboratory results and struggled with limited treatment options. In addition, many treated patients experienced an alarming degree of drug toxicity from CRE therapies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
India 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,237,422
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#5,013
of 6,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,744
of 338,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection control and hospital epidemiology (Online)
#701
of 796 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 796 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.