↓ Skip to main content

Glycated Hemoglobin Measurement and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
87 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Glycated Hemoglobin Measurement and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, March 2014
DOI 10.1001/jama.2014.1873
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The value of measuring levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for the prediction of first cardiovascular events is uncertain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 277 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 17%
Researcher 42 15%
Professor 26 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 17 6%
Other 76 26%
Unknown 57 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 146 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Computer Science 7 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 72 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2024.
All research outputs
#471,894
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5,214
of 42,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,373
of 269,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#48
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 73.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.