↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimation of the impact of vaccination on faecal shedding and organ and egg contamination for Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Typhiumurium and monophasic Salmonella Typhimurium
Published in
Avian Pathology, March 2014
DOI 10.1080/03079457.2014.896990
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) and, to a lesser extent, Salmonella Typhimurium (ST) are associated with egg-related outbreaks in people. Recently, monophasic strains of ST (mST; lacking one phase of the flagellar antigen) have been described, and they have officially been classified as variants of ST and thus may contribute to human exposure to contaminated eggs. Currently used vaccination programmes are licensed for use against biphasic variants of ST, and their efficacy against mST has not yet been investigated. In this study, the effectiveness of four vaccination programmes currently in use in the UK poultry industry was evaluated against challenge with one SE strain, one ST strain and two mST strains. A Bayesian model was used to estimate the impact of vaccination on the rate of faecal shedding and on egg contamination. For the majority of vaccine/challenge strain combinations, there was little or no effect of vaccination on the proportion of birds shedding Salmonella for either biphasic or monophasic strains. However, vaccination was effective at reducing egg contamination. A significantly lower proportion of eggshells were positive for the vaccinated birds compared with non-vaccinated birds, including the mST strains (vaccination resulted in a 55% and 21% reduction for the two mST strains). Calculated across all strains, the estimated rate of positive egg contents was lower in vaccinated birds (Bayesian median was 0.13% for vaccinated birds versus 0.27% for non-vaccinated birds). For both vaccinated and unvaccinated birds, there was also an apparent difference in the proportion of positive organs between strains, with the SE strain resulting in a lower proportion of positive organs at post-mortem examination compared with the other strains.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 5 11%
Unspecified 1 2%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,442,077
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from Avian Pathology
#180
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,730
of 223,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Avian Pathology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them