↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative Predictors of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Arthroplasty, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Preoperative Predictors of Pain Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
Published in
The Journal of Arthroplasty, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.034
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty has provided dramatic improvements in function and pain for the majority of patients with knee arthritis, yet a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied with their results. We performed a prospective analysis of 215 patients undergoing TKA who underwent a comprehensive array of evaluations to discover whether any preoperative assessment could predict high pain scores and functional limitations postoperatively. Patients with severe pain with a simple knee range-of-motion test prior to TKA had a 10 times higher likelihood of moderate to severe pain at 6months. A simple test of pain intensity with active flexion and extension preoperatively was a significant predictor of postoperative pain at 6months after surgery. Strategies to address this particular patient group may improve satisfaction rates of TKA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 197 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 14 7%
Other 42 21%
Unknown 59 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Psychology 14 7%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 72 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2020.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#3,404
of 4,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,934
of 322,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Arthroplasty
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.