↓ Skip to main content

Formally Copper(III)–Alkylperoxo Complexes as Models of Possible Intermediates in Monooxygenase Enzymes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Chemical Society, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Formally Copper(III)–Alkylperoxo Complexes as Models of Possible Intermediates in Monooxygenase Enzymes
Published in
Journal of the American Chemical Society, July 2017
DOI 10.1021/jacs.7b05754
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Reaction of [NBu4][LCu(II)OH] with excess ROOH (R = cumyl or tBu) yielded [NBu4][LCu(II)OOR], the reversible one-electron oxidation of which generated novel species with [CuOOR](2+) cores (formally Cu(III)OOR), identified by spectroscopy and theory for the case R = cumyl. This species reacts with weak O-H bonds in TEMPO-H and 4-dimethylaminophenol ((NMe2)PhOH), the latter yielding LCu(OPh(NMe2)), which was also prepared independently. With the identification of [CuOOR](2+) complexes, the first precedent for this core in enzymes is provided, with implications for copper monooxygenase mechanisms.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 31%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 61 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,510,607
of 24,140,950 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#53,501
of 64,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,798
of 318,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Chemical Society
#360
of 545 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,140,950 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,171 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 545 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.