↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cost-effectiveness and equity impacts of three HPV vaccination programmes for school-aged girls in New Zealand
Published in
Vaccine, March 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.071
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

As with many high-income countries, vaccination coverage against human papilloma virus (HPV) infection is not high in New Zealand (NZ) at 47% in school-aged girls for three doses. We estimate the health gains, net-cost and cost-effectiveness of the currently implemented HPV national vaccination programme of vaccination dispersed across schools and primary care, and two alternatives: school-based only (assumed coverage as per Australia: 73%), and mandatory school-based vaccination but with opt-out permitted (coverage 93%). We also generate estimates by social group (sex, ethnic and deprivation group).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 205 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 54 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 32%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 7%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2024.
All research outputs
#3,287,284
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
#3,129
of 19,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,100
of 257,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
#30
of 210 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 210 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.