↓ Skip to main content

Polygenic risk score analysis of pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Neurology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Polygenic risk score analysis of pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease
Published in
Annals of Neurology, August 2017
DOI 10.1002/ana.24999
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous estimates of the utility of polygenic risk score analysis for the prediction of Alzheimer's disease have given Area Under the Curve estimates of <80%. However, these have been based on the genetic analysis of clinical case control series. Here we apply the same analytic approaches to a pathological case control series and show a predictive AUC of 84%. We suggest that this analysis has clinical utility and that there is limited room for further improvement using genetic data. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 18%
Researcher 41 18%
Student > Master 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 10 5%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 66 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 15%
Neuroscience 27 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Computer Science 10 5%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 83 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,522,318
of 32,056,643 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#1,618
of 6,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,784
of 345,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#25
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,056,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.