↓ Skip to main content

A rapid 3D fat–water decomposition method using globally optimal surface estimation (R‐GOOSE)

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A rapid 3D fat–water decomposition method using globally optimal surface estimation (R‐GOOSE)
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/mrm.26843
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To improve the graph model of our previous work GOOSE for fat-water decomposition with higher computational efficiency and quantitative accuracy. A modification of the GOOSE fat water decomposition algorithm is introduced while the global convergence guarantees of GOOSE are still inherited to minimize fat-water swaps and phase wraps. In this paper, two non-equidistant graph optimization frameworks are proposed as a single-step framework termed as rapid GOOSE (R-GOOSE), and a multi-step framework termed as multi-scale R-GOOSE (mR-GOOSE). Both frameworks contain considerably less graph connectivity than GOOSE, resulting in a great computation reduction thus making it readily applicable to multidimensional fat water applications. The quantitative accuracy and computational time of the novel frameworks are compared with GOOSE on the 2012 ISMRM Challenge datasets to demonstrate the improvement in performance. Both frameworks accomplish the same level of high accuracy as GOOSE among all datasets. Compared to 100 layers in GOOSE, only 8 layers were used in the new graph model. Computational time is lowered by an order of magnitude to around 5 s for each dataset in (mR-GOOSE), R-GOOSE achieves an average run-time of 8 s. The proposed method provides fat-water decomposition results with a lower run-time and higher accuracy compared to the previously proposed GOOSE algorithm. Magn Reson Med, 2017. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Master 4 20%
Researcher 4 20%
Professor 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 5 25%
Physics and Astronomy 2 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 8 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2026.
All research outputs
#9,747,047
of 31,684,203 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#3,332
of 8,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,270
of 342,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#29
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,684,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.