↓ Skip to main content

Automation of pattern recognition analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data to characterize intratumoral vascular heterogeneity

Overview of attention for article published in Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Automation of pattern recognition analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data to characterize intratumoral vascular heterogeneity
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/mrm.26822
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To automate dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) data analysis by unsupervised pattern recognition (PR) to enable spatial mapping of intratumoral vascular heterogeneity. Three steps were automated. First, the arrival time of the contrast agent at the tumor was determined, including a calculation of the precontrast signal. Second, four criteria-based algorithms for the slice-specific selection of number of patterns (NP) were validated using 109 tumor slices from subcutaneous flank tumors of five different tumor models. The criteria were: half area under the curve, standard deviation thresholding, percent signal enhancement, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The performance of these criteria was assessed by comparing the calculated NP with the visually determined NP. Third, spatial assignment of single patterns and/or pattern mixtures was obtained by way of constrained nonnegative matrix factorization. The determination of the contrast agent arrival time at the tumor slice was successfully automated. For the determination of NP, the SNR-based approach outperformed other selection criteria by agreeing >97% with visual assessment. The spatial localization of single patterns and pattern mixtures, the latter inferring tumor vascular heterogeneity at subpixel spatial resolution, was established successfully by automated assignment from DCE-MRI signal-versus-time curves. The PR-based DCE-MRI analysis was successfully automated to spatially map intratumoral vascular heterogeneity. Magn Reson Med, 2017. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Physics and Astronomy 3 16%
Engineering 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2017.
All research outputs
#21,938,746
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#6,310
of 7,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,028
of 319,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
#79
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,045 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.