↓ Skip to main content

Multiplex Staining by Sequential Immunostaining and Antibody Removal on Routine Tissue Sections

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
206 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Multiplex Staining by Sequential Immunostaining and Antibody Removal on Routine Tissue Sections
Published in
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, July 2017
DOI 10.1369/0022155417719419
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Multiplexing, labeling for multiple immunostains in the very same cell or tissue section in situ, has raised considerable interest. The methods proposed include the use of labeled primary antibodies, spectral separation of fluorochromes, bleaching of the fluorophores or chromogens, blocking of previous antibody layers, all in various combinations. The major obstacles to the diffusion of this technique are high costs in custom antibodies and instruments, low throughput, and scarcity of specialized skills or facilities. We have validated a method based on common primary and secondary antibodies and diffusely available fluorescent image scanners. It entails rounds of four-color indirect immunofluorescence, image acquisition, and removal (stripping) of the antibodies, before another stain is applied. The images are digitally registered and the autofluorescence is subtracted. Removal of antibodies is accomplished by disulfide cleavage and a detergent or by a chaotropic salt treatment, this latter followed by antigen refolding. More than 30 different antibody stains can be applied to one single section from routinely fixed and embedded tissue. This method requires a modest investment in hardware and materials and uses freeware image analysis software. Multiplexing on routine tissue sections is a high throughput tool for in situ characterization of neoplastic, reactive, inflammatory, and normal cells.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 341 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Master 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 10%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 103 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 47 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 8%
Neuroscience 26 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 24 7%
Other 41 12%
Unknown 111 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2026.
All research outputs
#3,083,867
of 33,695,692 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
#66
of 2,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,983
of 355,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,695,692 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,631 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them