↓ Skip to main content

The effect of ankle foot orthosis alignment on walking in individuals treated for traumatic lower extremity injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomechanics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The effect of ankle foot orthosis alignment on walking in individuals treated for traumatic lower extremity injuries
Published in
Journal of Biomechanics, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.037
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Limb salvage surgeries are performed to treat a variety of lower limb pathologies and traumatic injuries. Individuals who have undergone limb salvage surgeries may require an ankle foot orthosis (AFO) to compensate for limb impairments and restore walking ability. Understanding the effects of AFO design parameters on gait biomechanics is important to refine AFO prescription criteria. In this study sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic data, muscle activity and alignment preference were examined as individuals treated for traumatic lower extremity injuries (N=12) walked over level ground with Plantarflexed (PF), Neutral, and Dorsiflexed (DF) aligned AFOs. A PF alignment resulted in earlier center of pressure progression (p<0.007) and a resulting decrease in both internal knee extensor moment (p<0.001) and quadriceps and soleus muscle activity (p<0.014) compared to the Neutral and DF alignments without affecting the lower limb support moment. A clear alignment preference was observed, with eight participants preferring the PF over the Neutral and DF alignments. The increase in internal knee extensor moment between the PF and DF alignments in the present study is consistent with previous investigations in other patient populations, suggesting a more DF aligned AFO may affect the knee joint moment similarly across patient populations. The results of this study suggest AFO alignment is an important design parameter that affects ankle and knee joint moments and muscle activity and should be carefully considered during AFO design and clinical fitting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 24 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 32 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,918,049
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomechanics
#3,633
of 5,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,428
of 325,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomechanics
#49
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.